I came across this article on the Times website, which discussed the rise in couples deciding to remain 'child-free' rather than 'childless'. Now, the two terms have very different implications: 'child-free' suggests that not having a family is a lifestyle choice, like sugarfree cola or sweets. 'Childless' says that the couple haven't had children yet, and had better get back in the bedroom quick-quick, as opposed to not being able to conceive (which, in another context, that can also mean).
It got me thinking about my own situation, as recently I met someone whose attitude to children is very much like mine: they're OK in small doses, but neither of us could eat a whole one.
I'm now 27, and have 4 nieces aged 13 - 21, and 5 nephews aged 8 - 26. When my eldest niece was born, I was six. Some of my most treasured childhood memories include holding her for the first time (and nearly dropping her), feeding her, changing her bottom, playing horsey with her and watching her take her first steps; and as I got older more babies came along. So I was basically doing bits of all the things parents do, minus bringing them into existence and paying the bills.
Throughout all that, I never once thought, 'Hey, I'd like to do this one day. This is alright, you know.'
Raising children, to me, is tiring, fraught with worry, lots of fun, rewarding, expensive and time consuming to the nth degree. You can learn as much from children as they do from you. They can age you, but also keep you young (the teens are the reason I know who JME is).
Can't say I'm overly keen on the idea of swollen ankles, piles, stretch marks and sore nipples/sagging tits, either. I can achieve those without any outside assistance, thanks.
But you know what? When you turn up at the school gates and all the kids know who you are because your niece/nephew/godchild talks endlessly about you, when they make you howl with laughter at their antics, draw pictures to tell you how much they love you; bring you pilfered donuts from work, do your hair, trust you enough to share personal things with you that they wouldn't tell mum or dad, devise a running program for you, or break away from their mates and run down the road to embrace you when they spot you out shopping, that cannot fail to melt your heart.
It makes all the tears and tantrums worthwhile; I love those kids to bits and although sometimes they drive me mad, I don't stop bloody going on about them.
That said, having children is not part of my life plan in any way whatsoever. It never has been and I'm pretty sure it never will. You can't rule anything out in this life, but it's more or less certain for me.
Does that make me selfish? Fuck, yeah, it makes me selfish. Does it make me a bad person? No.
I don't want to have to worry about a child. Nor do I want a partner who behaves like one, either. And I drew both of those conclusions from my own experience.
People say that this world is 'too violent' to bring children into, but it's a silly reason not to have kids - a fair point if you live in Darfur or Baghdad, perhaps. If you live in Purley, then shut it.
At a soiree a few years ago, I got talking to a woman who'd gone through IVF to conceive. When she asked if if I had any children of my own, I told her that I wasn't interested in having any, and she was shocked. How could I not want children? she asked. After all, that's why we are put on the earth.
If you look at it from a purely biological point of view, then I suppose she has a point. You are born, you reproduce and you die. Circle of life, innit? But unlike a plant or an animal, I can make a conscious choice not to procreate, and I shouldn't be demonised for it. I suppose that for a woman who had been through so much to have her beloved son, hearing someone say they want no part of parenthood is a little sour to the taste.
Men also don't quite know how to handle this, either. I've been told that I 'haven't met the right man yet', but my response is that the right man would feel the same way as me. In a relationship it's a deal-breaker, so if I was asked by my partner to consider starting a family, I'd sooner walk away than go through something I didn't feel at all comfortable with, no matter how much I loved him. I don't think I'd be a bad parent, far from it; but whatever sporadic and feeble maternal urges I have are spent on my sibling's kids, and that really is OK with me.
In fact, my eldest niece was asked by a mutual friend of ours why I hadn't had children with my (ex) partner. Her response? 'She's got us kids already and is happy with that.'
Then there's the whole age thing. I'm still hanging on to the under-30s by my painted fingernails, but I know enough to know my own mind by now. It's not as if I want to be sterilised, but women my age tend to be discouraged from having any contraceptive implants that last longer than 5 years, despite the fact that they alone know what they want. I detect a faint whiff of 'being dictated to'.
Because of personal experience, I can empathise with women who have been at the 'either/or' crossroads. I don't feel superior in any way to those who want to have children but don't know how to fit them into their lives before it's 'too late', and I don't feel inferior to those super mums who juggle careers, popping out babies in lunch meetings or somesuch. I don't (and shouldn't) feel sorry for those who give up promising careers - willingly and maybe even happily - to devote more time to their children, as my own mum did that for me and my siblings; I really admire her for it. You make these decisions, and you do what you feel is best under the circumstances.
As for my biological clock, I feel nothing at all.
Another question that's raised is 'who will look after you in old age?'. That's not a good reason to have children either! That's tantamount to 'Why have a dog, and bark yourself?'
If I live long enough to be able to retire, care should only be an issue if I am in poor health - and there are ways and means of being taken care of.
So yes - remaining child-free a selfish decision, but it's mine to make. I wouldn't dream of dissing someone who loved children and wanted to have a house full of babies, any more than they should declare me a blot on humanity for not wanting the same thing. What I want, and what YOU want, may be two different things and that's all they are: different. I'll respect your decision, but it's only fair that you also respect mine.
There Is Nothing New Under the Sun
50 minutes ago



17 repeat after me:
I'm in the exact opposiet situation. I desperately want to have a child and worry I never will, and my biological clock is practically worn out with old age!
On another note, I feel resentful of the way that parents in my workplace are given much more flexibility than non-parents. Just because I don't have a child, it doesn't mean I don't have a life!
Or even opposite.
I have never understood why choosing not to have children should be considered more selfish than choosing to have them. After all, most people who decide to reproduce are responding to a very selfish but very human deep motivation: the wish to REproduce yourself, to create a new (posibly better) version of your genes, to raise and educate a person according to your opinions and principles. Not only selfish, but egocentric, too!
So I don't think we should be admitting to any selfishness. I contribute to society in many other ways, and I don't consider myself so wonderful so as to make the world deal with a bunch of mini-mes.
I'm with cayetana on this one -- I don't see why one decision should be considered more or less selfish than the other. And personally, I'm still surprised when I talk to girls who are barely twenty telling me how many kids they plan to have by the time they're 25...
I can't judge you, cos I feel much the same as you do. Minus the extended family.
I think it shows strength of character when a person can make a logical choice that overrides genetically coded instincts.
There are PLENTY of people in the world. I don't see that changing any time soon -- unless global warming kills most of us :-/
I felt exactly as you when I was 18; actually no I didn't- because I hated kids. All kids. To be honest- even now the only two children I can say I truly like and love are my own!
Now I'm 33 and have two kids aged 14 and 5. They were both unplanned but are very much loved. And I'm sure if you ever found yourself in the position of being pregnant (and keeping it) you would feel the same about your kid.
Having said that- enjoy your child-free life CB; I'll certainly continue to envy it whenever I can't get a night off from parenting!
Letting you into a little secret here CB, Mrs Ump and I are the most fertile couple on the planet. Not in terms of actual output (one and a bit - expect a blogging hiatus come September) but in terms of speed of conception. Enough information.
I don't, however, think you're being selfish. You still pay taxes, and therefore go to fund other people's children, so if anything you are being generous. You do it is true rely on others to have children in that in advanced age you might come to rely on someone younger (ie someone else's sprog) to take care of you, but it will either be paid for by taxes - to which hopefully you've contributed all your life - or by your private income.
I find selfish those who bring children into the world without any clue or means to bring them up. Not necessarily income, or solely income, I should add. I wouldn't expect forced adoptions of children whose parents are on benefits, like a few social hitlers have suggested over the years (the former NZ finance minster, a woman with a deeper voice than me, once said that mothers under the age of 18 should adopt out their kids 'to help them' (the mothers or kids or both, I don't know)). I mean those who are abusive parents and otherwise unsuitable arses. Sadly this isn't something I have a solution for, I just like whinging about it.
Meanwhile keep babysitting your nieces & nephews. That makes a difference to the lives of the parents that only parents can truly appreciate!
I understand totally where you are coming from, I have no great desire to reproduce though would dearly love to be in a position in the future to adopt children
Great article. Someone publish this and pay you lots of cash. I'll digg it.
Fewer humans = good, btw.
but
concraceptive implants, surely = bad?
To be perfectly brutally honest I'd much rather have a cat. They are much more rewarding, you get to keep your own waistline, and as a rule, they can litter train themselves. And they're cheaper.
Thing is, though, don't have two of them when you want to move to France in a couple of years. Big mistake! The big fat one will be all right, but the little one that was hand reared as a kitten is going to go ballistic.
I'm 19, and its hilarious to see loads of girls I went to school with pushing prams and pregnant. That's their life now, and i get to go out when I like, go to gigs, take off to Wales or wherever for a weekend, stay in bed til 2 in the afternoon (which I did today), and generally make the most of life. I'd be more proud of writing a novel than having a kid. One of my friends is the same age as me and found out last year she couldn't have kids, and she's the really maternal type. And I thought, 'Why couldn't that have been me?'
: )
Good post. No decision is more or less valid than another. It is wrong when people assume it is somehow unnatural not to want to reproduce. I'm in my thirties and while I have moments when I'm not averse to the idea it is not really a big deal for me. If it happens it happens, if it doesn't then I can deal with that.
I want babies but then again, I really don't. I guess I'm just gonna have to sit back and see which side wins.
You gave your niece a new bottom!!! One changes their nappies dear. :-)
Lots of issues here and ignoring the more complicated sociological, anthropological and ecomonic issues associated with societies need for children, my advice is simple; if you choose not to have children it won't make you unhappy, if you choose to have children it won't make you happy.
That said, if you do have kids, you probably won't want to give them back... except when they drive you crazy.
Style is surely our own thing, not the false disguise of showbiz.
It's funny because there are times I am right on board with you. I see myself as being "child-free" and enjoying it.
But...
A real good friend came up to me about 6 months ago while watching me coach a peewee hockey game. She looked at me and said point blank "It'd be a shame if you don't end up someones father, you'd be so great at it." I was taken back, flabbergasted, humbled a little, and flattered. I'll be honest... since that day I have kind of taken what she said to heart. Maybe I would make a good dad afterall? Or maybe I'll stay the course and be the cool uncle.
I'm going to copy this and put it up on my site. Great post Blue!
Greetings from a fellow novel racer. Great post - I am in a very similar position, although I'm 15 years older than you. I realised, when I was 22, that 'you'll have children when you grow up' was my parents' story for me, not my own. As soon as I knew I had a choice, I knew what the choice was. It's been a deal-breaker for a couple of relationships - I learned to out myself as non-maternal at a very early stage, to avoid heartbreak later. Some older women have expressed envy because they didn't have the choice. I'm glad I live in a time and a society when we can choose.
Thing is China Blue - and this is such an unpleasant truth that I have to go anonymous - it's not that you haven't met the right man yet. It's that if you don't want children there's no such thing as the right man, at least in the 'mates for life' sense.
Because exactly the same things that make a man not want children make him not want a mate for life. Why be free of kids and not be free of a woman?
Post a Comment